Hello Sakari,

Thanks a lot for your feedback.

On 08/11/2016 07:18 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 02:10:43PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:

[snip]

>>>  
>>> +   ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, registered_async);
>>> +   if (ret < 0) {
>>> +           if (notifier->unbind)
>>> +                   notifier->unbind(notifier, sd, asd);
>>> +           return ret;
>>> +   }
>>> +
>>>     if (list_empty(&notifier->waiting) && notifier->complete)
>>>             return notifier->complete(notifier);
>>
>> I noticed this just now but what do you need this and the next patch for?
>>
>> We already have a callback for the same purpose: it's
>> v4l2_subdev_ops.internal_ops.registered(). And there's similar
>> unregistered() callback as well.
>>

Oh, I missed we already had those calls. When adding the connector
support, I looked at struct v4l2_subdev_core_ops and didn't find a
callback that fit but didn't notice we already had a .registered()
in struct struct v4l2_subdev_internal_ops. Sorry about that...

>> Could you use these callbacks instead?

Yes, those can be used indeed. I'll post patches using that instead
and removing the .registered_async callback since as you said isn't
really needed.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

Reply via email to