On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 03:56:59PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 06:43:31PM +0900, byungchul.p...@lge.com wrote:
> > From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> This patch was rejected and the next version having tried to apply what
> peterz recommanded, was almost ignored last year. But now, exactly same
> thing is already in the tree which was posted by Tim Chen. Yes. This is
> a trivial one, I thus don't mind much. Commiting patches is not important.
I meant that "Whether my patches are commited or not is not important".
> However, I want to ask you to treat patches by new one like me with more
> consideration, please. Sometimes I feel thankful while sometimes I feel
> disappointed with a happening like this. It would be appriciated if you
> do so.
>
> Thank you,
> Byungchul
>
> >
> > account_numa_dequeue and manipulating se->group_node are meaningful only on
> > SMP
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 09456fc..93b8de6 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -2337,15 +2337,17 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> > struct sched_entity *se)
> > update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight);
> > if (!parent_entity(se))
> > update_load_sub(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, se->load.weight);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > if (entity_is_task(se)) {
> > account_numa_dequeue(rq_of(cfs_rq), task_of(se));
> > list_del_init(&se->group_node);
> > }
> > +#endif
> > cfs_rq->nr_running--;
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> > -# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > static inline long calc_tg_weight(struct task_group *tg, struct cfs_rq
> > *cfs_rq)
> > {
> > long tg_weight;
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
