Am 28.08.2016 07:59, schrieb Mikko Rapeli: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 05:38:00PM +0200, walter harms wrote: >> perhaps this not tested snipped would make sure that >> you have included linux/rose.h ? >> >> #ifndef ROSE_KERNEL_H >> #include <linux/rose.h> >> #endif >> >> #include <netrose/rose.h> > > Sorry, I did not quite get this. > > <linux/rose.h> has conflicting definitions with glibc <netrose/rose.h>. > The patches fixes the uapi headers <linux/rose.h> so that it hides > definitions if <netrose/rose.h> from glibc was already included. > > -Mikko
no problem, so far i understand the conflict arise because you need to include linux/rose.h before netrose/rose.h My suggestion was to add a check for linux/rose.h (ROSE_KERNEL_H) and include it if not already done. (basicly this should work out of the box but it seems a problem here). I have no idea if you need to cover other cases but in my understanding userspace programms should not include kernel headers. re, wh
