On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 01:56:15PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> @@ -80,20 +80,29 @@ static __read_mostly bool nf_conntrack_locks_all;
>  
>  void nf_conntrack_lock(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock)
>  {
> +     /* Step 1: Acquire the lock */
>       spin_lock(lock);
> -     while (unlikely(nf_conntrack_locks_all)) {
> -             spin_unlock(lock);
>  
> -             /*
> -              * Order the 'nf_conntrack_locks_all' load vs. the
> -              * spin_unlock_wait() loads below, to ensure
> -              * that 'nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock' is indeed held:
> -              */
> -             smp_rmb(); /* spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock) */
> -             spin_unlock_wait(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
> -             spin_lock(lock);
> -     }
> +     /* Step 2: make it visible to all CPUs that we hold the lock */
> +     smp_mb__after_spin_lock();

I hate this comment. A barrier does _not_ make visible anything.

A barrier _orders_ things.

Reply via email to