On Thursday, September 1, 2016 1:12:18 PM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> > Shouldn't macros that are also used by s3c* be named as
> > SAMSUNG_PIN_FUNC_2 etc. (s3c* SoCs are not Exynos)?
>
> Right, this is the inconsistency. The problem with "samsung" prefix is
> that there is no guarantee it will be like that for newer SoCs. How
> about one of:
> 1. using the oldest prefix (S3C24XX in this case),
> 2. duplicating them per SoC family (so S3C24XX, S3C64XX, EXYNOS).
> ?
I'd suggest living with the inconsistency and using EXYNOS as the prefix,
as that is the most common one these days, even if the other ones
predate it.
Arnd
