On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am pretty hesitant replacing the rock-solid ext4 by bcachefs on my servers. > Meaning no offense, but surely I would prefer to have ext4 with a thin "SSD > caching layer" over a completely different filesystem, potentially with alot > of teething troubles. > > Question: Is bcache EOL or can I rely on it for the next 5 to 10 years?
bcache is not EOL - it's still receiving bugfixes. That said though, there's no reason to expect a long teething period with bcachefs, it's already more reliable than btrfs in single device mode.
