Theodore, On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 17:49 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > This patch introduces the Makefile before any of the source > files, which means it will break "git bisect" operations. Could you > please refactor your patches so that the tree will build after any > point in your patch series?
I actually did not mean these patches should be included to a git. We have UBI git to pull from for these purposes. I basically manually split the UBI sources to make UBI easier to review. I should have added an "RFC" tag, apologies. > BTW, I'm not personally found of having a separate .h file for > every .c file; in my mind a much better division is a public and > private header file. This reflects the way of my thinking. I see UBI as a set of units with defined interfaces. So I even physically split the interface description into files. I still think it is easier to grasp the architecture this way. So, it is not distinct header for _.c_ file, it is a distinct header for each _unit_, which is a basic architecture element of UBI. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
