We should deboost before waking the high-priority task, such that we
don't run two tasks with the same "state" (priority, deadline,
sched_class, etc).

In order to make sure the boosting task doesn't start running between
unlock and deboost (due to 'spurious' wakeup), we move the deboost
under the wait_lock, that way its serialized against the wait loop in
__rt_mutex_slowlock().

Doing the deboost early can however lead to priority-inversion if
current would get preempted after the deboost but before waking our
high-prio task, hence we disable preemption before doing deboost, and
enabling it after the wake up is over.

This gets us the right semantic order, but most importantly however;
this change ensures pointer stability for the next patch, where we
have rt_mutex_setprio() cache a pointer to the top-most waiter task.
If we, as before this change, do the wakeup first and then deboost,
this pointer might point into thin air.

[peterz: Changelog + patch munging]
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
---

 kernel/futex.c                  |    5 +---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c        |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h |    1 
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1374,9 +1374,8 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
         * scheduled away before the wake up can take place.
         */
        spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
-       wake_up_q(&wake_q);
-       if (deboost)
-               rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
+
+       rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
 
        return 0;
 }
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -307,24 +307,6 @@ static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struc
 }
 
 /*
- * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of
- * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock().
- *
- * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to
- * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority
- * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are
- * outside of the debug path.)
- */
-void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
-{
-       unsigned long flags;
-
-       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-       __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
-       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
-}
-
-/*
  * Deadlock detection is conditional:
  *
  * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
@@ -987,6 +969,7 @@ static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(stru
         * lock->wait_lock.
         */
        rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
+       __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
 
        /*
         * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays
@@ -1325,6 +1308,16 @@ static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(
         */
        mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
 
+       /*
+        * We should deboost before waking the top waiter task such that
+        * we don't run two tasks with the 'same' priority. This however
+        * can lead to prio-inversion if we would get preempted after
+        * the deboost but before waking our high-prio task, hence the
+        * preempt_disable before unlock. Pairs with preempt_enable() in
+        * rt_mutex_postunlock();
+        */
+       preempt_disable();
+
        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
 
        /* check PI boosting */
@@ -1390,14 +1383,23 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *loc
        } else {
                bool deboost = slowfn(lock, &wake_q);
 
-               wake_up_q(&wake_q);
-
-               /* Undo pi boosting if necessary: */
-               if (deboost)
-                       rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
+               rt_mutex_postunlock(&wake_q, deboost);
        }
 }
 
+
+/*
+ * Undo pi boosting (if necessary) and wake top waiter.
+ */
+void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost)
+{
+       wake_up_q(wake_q);
+
+       /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in rt_mutex_slowunlock() */
+       if (deboost)
+               preempt_enable();
+}
+
 /**
  * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex
  *
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ extern int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(st
 extern int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *l, struct 
hrtimer_sleeper *to);
 extern bool rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
                                  struct wake_q_head *wqh);
+extern void rt_mutex_postunlock(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, bool deboost);
 extern void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES


Reply via email to