On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ken, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken....@advantech.com> wrote: > >> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for >> 1920x1080@60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual >> measurement result looked good as we expected. >> I think the patches should fix the issue. > > That's good news. Thanks for testing. > > Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series. > > Emil, > > Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.
And what will be done regarding 4.8? Is the faulty change to be reverted or this patches will be backported? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
