On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:29:22PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:01:43AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:23:04PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > In order to provide access to locality registers, this commits adds > > > > mapping of the head of the CRB registers, which are located right > > > > before the control area. > > > > > > I think you should squash this into the prior patch, no sense in > > > changing all these lines twice > > > > > > But looks better to me. > > > > So... do you suggest to squash with request/reliquish locality stuff? > > Just checking because this is 1/3 :) > > Hm, maybe my mailer went wrong, but I saw the original patch right > before this one.. Never mind
I did format-patch -o to the same folder where I had the first series so I posted the RFC patches by accident. Sorry. Should always do --dry-run. > Jason /Jarkko
