Stephen Boyd <[email protected]> writes: > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Robert Jarzmik <[email protected]> writes: >> Hi Michael and Stephen, >> >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in the >> data >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values were >> wrong. >> >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next week >> or >> should I delay the v2 posting ? >> > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. > What's blocking that? OPP tables?
Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer. To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or "with platform_data" or something else. >From what I've seen so far, the missing/blocking points are : - the OPP points definition as you said - probably same thing for the input power supply / regulator - the cooling parts probably - and more generaly all the cpufreq-dt is built around device-tree - last point, the name from KConfig, "Generic DT based cpufreq driver" => that strongly suggest it's device-tree only I'm deeply convinced that Viresh being one of the authors will shed more light on this. Cheers. -- Robert
