On 19-10-16, 13:51, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/19, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> writes: > > > > > On 10/18, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > > >> Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr> writes: > > >> Hi Michael and Stephen, > > >> > > >> I'm planing on sending a v2 next week with minor corrections, mostly in > > >> the data > > >> tables (pxa25x_freqs and pxa27x_freqs), as testing prooved some values > > >> were wrong. > > >> > > >> If you want me modify this serie, will you have time to review for next > > >> week or > > >> should I delay the v2 posting ? > > >> > > > > > > No need to delay. clk patches look fine with a quick glance. It > > > would be really neat if we could make cpufreq-dt work without DT. > > > What's blocking that? OPP tables? > > > > Heu I'm not the author of cpufreq-dt, so I'm not the best to answer. > > To answer the question "without DT", it depends if you mean "with ACPI" or > > "with > > platform_data" or something else. > > I mean platform_data mostly. Do you use ACPI with the clk driver?
I would like to see sample code for that, as I am not sure what all changes would be required in cpufreq-dt in that case. Yes it is more dependent on the OPP framework than DT right now. My first impression is that it should be doable.. -- viresh
