On 10/14, [email protected] wrote:
> @@ -310,6 +310,15 @@ static inline void 
> enable_power_domain_write_protection(void)
>       regmap_update_bits(pdrm, 0x00, (1 << 8), (0 << 8));
>  }
>  
> +static inline void sofware_reset_backup_domain(void)
> +{
> +     unsigned long val;
> +
> +     val = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
> +     writel(val |= (1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);

Interesting C style here! Why set the bit in val that will then
be cleared in the next function call? Please just don't do it. It
would be better to do writel(val | BIT(16), ...)

> +     writel(val & ~(1 << 16), base + STM32F4_RCC_BDCR);
> +}
> +
>  struct stm32_rgate {
>       struct  clk_hw hw;
>       struct  clk_gate gate;
> @@ -396,6 +405,113 @@ static struct clk_hw *clk_register_rgate(struct device 
> *dev, const char *name,
>       return hw;
>  }
>  
> +static int cclk_gate_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     disable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +     ret = clk_gate_ops.enable(hw);
> +
> +     enable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void cclk_gate_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +     disable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +     clk_gate_ops.disable(hw);
> +
> +     enable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +}
> +
> +static int cclk_gate_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +     return clk_gate_ops.is_enabled(hw);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_gate_ops = {
> +     .enable         = cclk_gate_enable,
> +     .disable        = cclk_gate_disable,
> +     .is_enabled     = cclk_gate_is_enabled,
> +};
> +
> +static u8 cclk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +     return clk_mux_ops.get_parent(hw);
> +}
> +
> +

Weird double newline here. Please remove one.

> +static int cclk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     disable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +     sofware_reset_backup_domain();
> +
> +     ret = clk_mux_ops.set_parent(hw, index);
> +
> +     enable_power_domain_write_protection();
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +

Same.

> +static const struct clk_ops cclk_mux_ops = {
> +     .get_parent = cclk_mux_get_parent,
> +     .set_parent = cclk_mux_set_parent,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct device *dev, const char 
> *name,
> +             const char * const *parent_names, int num_parents,
> +             void __iomem *reg, u8 bit_idx, u8 shift, unsigned long flags,
> +             spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +     struct clk_hw *hw;
> +     struct clk_gate *gate;
> +     struct clk_mux *mux;
> +
> +     gate = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_gate), GFP_KERNEL);

sizeof(*gate) please.

> +     if (!gate) {
> +             hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +             goto fail;
> +     }
> +
> +     mux = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_mux), GFP_KERNEL);

sizeof(*mux) please.

> +     if (!mux) {
> +             kfree(gate);
> +             hw = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +             goto fail;
> +     }
> +

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to