On 01/11/16 09:08, Songjun Wu wrote:
Release the filehandle in 'isc_open' if it's not the only filehandle
opened for the associated video_device.

What's wrong with that? You should always be able to open the device
multiple times. v4l2-compliance will fail after this patch. I'm not sure
what you intended to do here, but this patch is wrong.

Regards,

        Hans


Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu <songjun...@microchip.com>
---

 drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
index 8e25d3f..5e08404 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
@@ -926,21 +926,21 @@ static int isc_open(struct file *file)
        if (ret < 0)
                goto unlock;

-       if (!v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file))
-               goto unlock;
+       ret = !v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file);
+       if (ret)
+               goto fh_rel;

        ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 1);
-       if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD) {
-               v4l2_fh_release(file);
-               goto unlock;
-       }
+       if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD)
+               goto fh_rel;

        ret = isc_set_fmt(isc, &isc->fmt);
-       if (ret) {
+       if (ret)
                v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
-               v4l2_fh_release(file);
-       }

+fh_rel:
+       if (ret)
+               v4l2_fh_release(file);
 unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&isc->lock);
        return ret;

Reply via email to