Sorry, my mistake, the device should be able to opened multiple times.
It's a wrong patch.

On 11/1/2016 16:52, Hans Verkuil wrote:
On 01/11/16 09:08, Songjun Wu wrote:
Release the filehandle in 'isc_open' if it's not the only filehandle
opened for the associated video_device.

What's wrong with that? You should always be able to open the device
multiple times. v4l2-compliance will fail after this patch. I'm not sure
what you intended to do here, but this patch is wrong.

Regards,

    Hans


Signed-off-by: Songjun Wu <songjun...@microchip.com>
---

 drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
index 8e25d3f..5e08404 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c
@@ -926,21 +926,21 @@ static int isc_open(struct file *file)
     if (ret < 0)
         goto unlock;

-    if (!v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file))
-        goto unlock;
+    ret = !v4l2_fh_is_singular_file(file);
+    if (ret)
+        goto fh_rel;

     ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 1);
-    if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD) {
-        v4l2_fh_release(file);
-        goto unlock;
-    }
+    if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD)
+        goto fh_rel;

     ret = isc_set_fmt(isc, &isc->fmt);
-    if (ret) {
+    if (ret)
         v4l2_subdev_call(sd, core, s_power, 0);
-        v4l2_fh_release(file);
-    }

+fh_rel:
+    if (ret)
+        v4l2_fh_release(file);
 unlock:
     mutex_unlock(&isc->lock);
     return ret;

Reply via email to