On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:26:57PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
>> mmdc of i.MX6QP are little difference with i.MX6Q.
>> added new compatible stream fsl,imx6qp-mmdc
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <frank...@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi
>> index 886dbf2..e0fdd0f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qp.dtsi
>> @@ -85,5 +85,12 @@
>> pcie: pcie@0x01000000 {
>> compatible = "fsl,imx6qp-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
>> };
>> +
>> + aips-bus@02100000 {
>> + mmdc0: mmdc@021b0000 { /* MMDC0 */
>> + compatible = "fsl,imx6qp-mmdc",
>> "fsl,imx6q-mmdc";
>
> Sine we already know that imx6qp-mmdc has a different programming model
> from imx6q-mmdc, it makes less sense to have "fsl,imx6q-mmdc" here.
PM code (Suspend and resume) use "fsl,imx6q-mmdc" to get mmdc's base
address to do some works.
best regards
Frank Li
>
> Shawn
>
>> + reg = <0x021b0000 0x4000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>> --
>> 2.5.2
>>
