On 11/3/2016 6:45 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Casey, the first patch broke filesystems that support setxattr for some xattrs
> but not security xattrs.  Here's an updated patch; could you please test?

This patch does not fix the problem. I am back to EOPTNOTSUP.

>
> Al, does this look mergeable?
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
> --
>
> The IOP_XATTR flag is set on sockfs because sockfs supports getting the
> "system.sockprotoname" xattr.  Commit 6c6ef9f2 started to check this
> flag for setxattr support as well.  This is wrong on sockfs because
> security xattr support there is provided by security_inode_setsecurity.
>
> Fix this by adding a security xattr handler on sockfs that returns
> -EAGAIN and by checking for -EAGAIN in setxattr.
>
> We cannot simply check for -EOPNOTSUPP in setxattr because there are
> filesystems that neither have direct security xattr support nor support
> via security_inode_setsecurity.  A more proper fix might be to move the
> call to security_inode_setsecurity into sockfs, but it's not clear to me
> if that is safe: we would end up calling security_inode_post_setxattr as
> well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/xattr.c   | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  net/socket.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c
> index 3368659..2d13b4e 100644
> --- a/fs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/xattr.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ int __vfs_setxattr_noperm(struct dentry *dentry, const 
> char *name,
>               const void *value, size_t size, int flags)
>  {
>       struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> -     int error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +     int error = -EAGAIN;
>       int issec = !strncmp(name, XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
>                                  XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX_LEN);
>  
> @@ -183,15 +183,21 @@ int __vfs_setxattr_noperm(struct dentry *dentry, const 
> char *name,
>                       security_inode_post_setxattr(dentry, name, value,
>                                                    size, flags);
>               }
> -     } else if (issec) {
> -             const char *suffix = name + XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX_LEN;
> -
> +     } else {
>               if (unlikely(is_bad_inode(inode)))
>                       return -EIO;
> -             error = security_inode_setsecurity(inode, suffix, value,
> -                                                size, flags);
> -             if (!error)
> -                     fsnotify_xattr(dentry);
> +     }
> +     if (error == -EAGAIN) {
> +             error = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +             if (issec) {
> +                     const char *suffix = name + XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX_LEN;
> +
> +                     error = security_inode_setsecurity(inode, suffix, value,
> +                                                        size, flags);
> +                     if (!error)
> +                             fsnotify_xattr(dentry);
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       return error;
> diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
> index 5a9bf5e..816392a 100644
> --- a/net/socket.c
> +++ b/net/socket.c
> @@ -341,6 +341,20 @@ static const struct xattr_handler sockfs_xattr_handler = 
> {
>       .get = sockfs_xattr_get,
>  };
>  
> +static int sockfs_security_xattr_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler,
> +                                  struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode,
> +                                  const char *suffix, const void *value,
> +                                  size_t size, int flags)
> +{
> +     /* Handled by LSM. */
> +     return -EAGAIN;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct xattr_handler sockfs_security_xattr_handler = {
> +     .prefix = XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX,
> +     .set = sockfs_security_xattr_set,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct xattr_handler *sockfs_xattr_handlers[] = {
>       &sockfs_xattr_handler,
>       NULL

Reply via email to