On 11/07/2016 03:49 AM, Joel Holdsworth wrote:
> The Lattice iCE40 is a family of FPGAs with a minimalistic architecture
> and very regular structure, designed for low-cost, high-volume consumer
> and system applications.

[...]

> +static int ice40_fpga_ops_write_init(struct fpga_manager *mgr, u32 flags,
> +                                  const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +     struct ice40_fpga_priv *priv = mgr->priv;
> +     struct spi_device *dev = priv->dev;
> +     struct spi_message message;
> +     struct spi_transfer assert_cs_then_reset_delay = {.cs_change = 1,
> +             .delay_usecs = ICE40_SPI_FPGAMGR_RESET_DELAY};

Should be this way for the sake of readability, fix globally:

        struct spi_transfer assert_cs_then_reset_delay = {
                .cs_change      = 1,
                .delay_usecs    = ICE40_SPI_FPGAMGR_RESET_DELAY
        };

Also I believe this could be const.

> +     struct spi_transfer housekeeping_delay_then_release_cs = {
> +             .delay_usecs = ICE40_SPI_FPGAMGR_HOUSEKEEPING_DELAY};

Don't we have some less hacky way of toggling the nCS ? Is this even nCS
or is this some control pin of the FPGA ? Maybe it should be treated
like a regular GPIO instead ?

[...]

> +static int ice40_fpga_ops_write_complete(struct fpga_manager *mgr, u32 flags)
> +{
> +     struct ice40_fpga_priv *priv = mgr->priv;
> +     struct spi_device *dev = priv->dev;
> +     const u8 padding[ICE40_SPI_FPGAMGR_NUM_ACTIVATION_BYTES] = {0,};

The comma is not needed.

> +
> +     /* Check CDONE is asserted */
> +     if (!gpiod_get_value(priv->cdone)) {
> +             dev_err(&dev->dev,
> +                     "CDONE was not asserted after firmware transfer\n");
> +             return -EIO;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Send of zero-padding to activate the firmware */
> +     return spi_write(dev, padding, sizeof(padding));
> +}

[...]

> +     /* Check board setup data. */
> +     if (spi->max_speed_hz > 25000000) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Speed is too high\n");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (spi->max_speed_hz < 1000000) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Speed is too low\n");
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }

Do you have some explanation for this limitation ?

[...]

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Reply via email to