On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > > > Which you don't in this patch: > > True. We will always in the end, but the split isn't right, we'll > need to pass the non-NULL argument starting in this patch.
No, in the previous one ....