On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > > > > > Which you don't in this patch: > > > > True. We will always in the end, but the split isn't right, we'll > > need to pass the non-NULL argument starting in this patch. > > No, in the previous one ....
That too, but it's for different functions. I have a rebased version that does this, I'll run it through quick testing and will repost it later today.
