On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:22:26PM +0400, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Regarding ILP32 runtime, my opinion is that it is acceptable for ILP32 > to have extra failures compared to LP64, since these are not > regressions, but, rather, failures of a new configuration.
I disagree with this. We definitely need to understand why they fail, otherwise we run the risk of potential glibc or kernel implementation bugs becoming ABI. -- Catalin
