On 11/19/2016 04:45 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/19/2016 04:42 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 11/19/2016 03:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> [...]
>>> @@ -206,15 +204,10 @@ static int __init smdk_audio_init(void)
>>> int ret;
>>> char *str;
>>>
>>> - if (machine_is_smdkc100()
>>> - || machine_is_smdkv210() || machine_is_smdkc110()) {
>>> - smdk.num_links = 3;
>>> - } else if (machine_is_smdk6410()) {
>>> - str = (char *)smdk_dai[PRI_PLAYBACK].cpu_dai_name;
>>> - str[strlen(str) - 1] = '2';
>>> - str = (char *)smdk_dai[PRI_CAPTURE].cpu_dai_name;
>>> - str[strlen(str) - 1] = '2';
>>> - }
>>> + str = (char *)smdk_dai[PRI_PLAYBACK].cpu_dai_name;
>>> + str[strlen(str) - 1] = '2';
>>> + str = (char *)smdk_dai[PRI_CAPTURE].cpu_dai_name;
>>> + str[strlen(str) - 1] = '2';
>>
>> This could be further simplified by just updating the initial cpu_dai_name
>> string in the dai_link struct.
>>
>> Especially considering that the cpu_dai_name is a string literal and the ARM
>> kernel now has rodata write protection enabled by default, so modifying it
>> will crash the kernel.
>
> Spoke too soon, you fix this up in the next patch. But I'd just squash that
> change into this patch. I think it is pretty safe to assume that it is
> correct.
>
And another thing. Since num_links is always 2 now the last entry from the
smdk_dai array can be removed and num_links can be initialized using
ARRAY_SIZE().
