Hi Amitkumar,

>> From: Amitkumar Karwar [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 6:27 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Cathy Luo;
>> Nishant Sarmukadam; Ganapathi Bhat; Amitkumar Karwar
>> Subject: [PATCH] btusb: fix zero BD address problem during stress test
>> 
>> From: Ganapathi Bhat <[email protected]>
>> 
>> We came across a corner case issue during reboot stress test in which
>> hciconfig shows BD address is all zero. Reason is we don't get response
>> for HCI RESET command during initialization
>> 
>> The issue is tracked to a race where USB subsystem calls
>> btusb_intr_complete() to deliver a data(NOOP frame) received on
>> interrupt endpoint. HCI_RUNNING flag is not yet set by bluetooth
>> subsystem. So we ignore that frame and return.
>> 
>> As we missed to resubmit the buffer to interrupt endpoint in this case,
>> we don't get response for BT reset command downloaded after this.
>> 
>> This patch handles the corner case to resolve zero BD address problem.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Bhat <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> index 811f9b9..b5596ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> @@ -607,10 +607,7 @@ static void btusb_intr_complete(struct urb *urb)
>>      BT_DBG("%s urb %p status %d count %d", hdev->name, urb, urb-
>>> status,
>>             urb->actual_length);
>> 
>> -    if (!test_bit(HCI_RUNNING, &hdev->flags))
>> -            return;
>> -
>> -    if (urb->status == 0) {
>> +    if (urb->status == 0 && test_bit(HCI_RUNNING, &hdev->flags)) {
>>              hdev->stat.byte_rx += urb->actual_length;
>> 
>>              if (btusb_recv_intr(data, urb->transfer_buffer,
> 
> Did you get a chance to check this?
> Please let us know if you have any review comments.

can you explain how this is correct and show me the HCI traces for this.

Regards

Marcel

Reply via email to