On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 01:37:04PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:44:44AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Kan Liang <kan.li...@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Caculate the total NMI overhead on each CPU, and display them in perf
> > > report
> >
> > so the output looks like this:
> >
> > ---
> > # Elapsed time: 1720167944 ns
> > # Overhead:
> > # CPU 6
> > # NMI#: 27 time: 111379 ns
> > # Multiplexing#: 0 time: 0 ns
> > # SB#: 57 time: 90045 ns
> > #
> > # Samples: 26 of event 'cycles:u'
> > # Event count (approx.): 1677531
> > #
> > # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> > # ........ ....... ................ .......................
> > #
> > 24.20% ls ls [.] _init
> > 17.18% ls libc-2.24.so [.] __strcoll_l
> > 11.85% ls ld-2.24.so [.] _dl_relocate_object
> > ---
how about we display the overhead information same way the main perf output:
CPU NMI NMI time MTX MTX time SB SB time
... ..... ........ ..... ........ ...... ........
6 27 111379 0 0 57 90045
would be just matter of adding new sort objects
jirka
