On Tue, 29 Nov, at 12:42:43PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > IIRC, and my pounding head really doesn't remember much, the comment > reads like we need the large fudge factor because hackbench. That is, > hackbench would like this test to go away, but others benchmarks will > tank. > > Now, if only I would've written down which benchmarks that were.. awell. Going out on a limb: Chris' schbench?
- [PATCH 0/2 v2] sched: improve spread of tasks during fork Vincent Guittot
- [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idlest_group for fork Vincent Guittot
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idlest_group ... Matt Fleming
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idlest_gr... Vincent Guittot
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idlest_group ... Morten Rasmussen
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idlest_gr... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idles... Matt Fleming
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_... Peter Zijlstra
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idles... Morten Rasmussen
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idlest_gr... Vincent Guittot
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_idles... Morten Rasmussen
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] sched: fix find_... Vincent Guittot
- [PATCH 2/2 v2] sched: use load_avg for selecting idl... Vincent Guittot
- Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] sched: improve spread of tasks du... Matt Fleming
- Re: [PATCH 0/2 v2] sched: improve spread of task... Vincent Guittot