Andrew Morton <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 23:45:46 +1100 Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This is v11 of the kexec_file_load() for powerpc series. >> >> I've stripped this down to the minimum we need, so we can get this in for >> 4.10. >> Any additions can come later incrementally. > > This made a bit of a mess of Mimi's series "ima: carry the > measurement list across kexec v10".
Urk, sorry about that. I didn't realise there was a big dependency between them, but I guess I should have tried to do the rebase. > powerpc-ima-get-the-kexec-buffer-passed-by-the-previous-kernel.patch > ima-on-soft-reboot-restore-the-measurement-list.patch > ima-permit-duplicate-measurement-list-entries.patch > ima-maintain-memory-size-needed-for-serializing-the-measurement-list.patch > powerpc-ima-send-the-kexec-buffer-to-the-next-kernel.patch > ima-on-soft-reboot-save-the-measurement-list.patch > ima-store-the-builtin-custom-template-definitions-in-a-list.patch > ima-support-restoring-multiple-template-formats.patch > ima-define-a-canonical-binary_runtime_measurements-list-format.patch > ima-platform-independent-hash-value.patch > > I made the syntactic fixes but I won't be testing it. Thanks. TBH I don't know how to test the IMA part, I'm relying on Thiago and Mimi to do that. >> If no one objects I'll merge this via the powerpc tree. The three kexec >> patches >> have been acked by Dave Young (since forever), and have been in linux-next >> (via >> akpm's tree) also for a long time. > > OK, I'll wait for these to appear in -next and I will await advice on Thanks. I'll let them stew for a few more hours and then put them in my next for tomorrows linux-next. cheers
