On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:04:30 +1100 Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:15:27 -0800 > "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Nicholas Piggin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:38:16 +0100 > > > "Luis R. Rodriguez" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:09:47PM +1100, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > > > >> What is wrong with that ? Separating linker table and section ranges is > > > > > > It's not that you separate those, of course you need that. It's that > > > you also separate other sections from the input section descriptions: > > > > > > - *(.text.hot .text .text.fixup .text.unlikely) \ > > > + *(.text.hot .text) \ > > > + *(SORT(.text.rng.*)) \ > > > + *(.text.fixup .text.unlikely) \ Ahh, you're doing it to avoid clash with compiler generated sections. The usual way to cope with that seems to be to use two dots for your name. .text..rng.*
