Hi Stephen, Mark > > This is v5 of "clkdev: add devm_of_clk_get()", but new series. > > I hope my understanding was correct with your idea. > > Yes this looks good. Given that we're so close to the merge > window, perhaps I should just merge the first patch into clk-next > and then it will be ready for anyone who wants to use it? The > sound patches can be left up to others to handle.
OK thanks. Mark, I think I should re-post 2nd patch (3rd will be dropped) after merge window ? There will be no branch dependency