[CC Andy]
I've noticed the same
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209142820.ga4...@dhcp22.suse.cz
and also concluded same as you
On Mon 12-12-16 17:46:21, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> DEBUG_PREEMPT complains about using this_cpu_ptr() in preemptible:
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code:
> iperf-300s-cs-l/277
> caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
> CPU: 1 PID: 277 Comm: iperf-300s-cs-l Not tainted
> 4.9.0-rc8-00140-gcc639db #2
> ffffc900003f3cf0 ffffffff8123ae6f 0000000000000001 ffffffff818181da
> ffffc900003f3d20 ffffffff81252f41 0000000000012de0 00000000fffffdff
> ffff880009328f40 ffff88000592c400 ffffc900003f3d30 ffffffff81252f6a
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8123ae6f>] dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0
> [<ffffffff81252f41>] check_preemption_disabled+0xdd/0xef
> [<ffffffff81252f6a>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x19
> [<ffffffff811796df>] __vfree_deferred+0x16/0x4c
> [<ffffffff8117b584>] vfree_atomic+0x22/0x24
> [<ffffffff81094f5d>] free_thread_stack+0xc2/0x106
> [<ffffffff810951be>] put_task_stack+0x4c/0x62
> [<ffffffff81095f81>] copy_process+0x7e0/0x16e8
> [<ffffffff8109702d>] _do_fork+0xbb/0x2d3
> [<ffffffff810465e8>] ? __do_page_fault+0x2e1/0x384
> [<ffffffff8112633f>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x12/0x24
> [<ffffffff810972cb>] SyS_clone+0x19/0x1b
> [<ffffffff81003800>] do_syscall_64+0x143/0x173
> [<ffffffff81507289>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
>
> Use raw_cpu_ptr() instead of this_cpu_ptr() to hide this warning.
> It's fine because llist_add() implementation is lock-less, so it works even
> if we adding to the list of some other cpu. schedule_work() is also
> preempt-safe.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <ying.hu...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 43f0608..d8813963 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1498,7 +1498,14 @@ static void __vunmap(const void *addr, int
> deallocate_pages)
>
> static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
> {
> - struct vfree_deferred *p = this_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
> + /*
> + * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
> + * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because llist_add()
> + * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we adding to list
> + * of the other cpu.
> + * schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
> + */
> + struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
>
> if (llist_add((struct llist_node *)addr, &p->list))
> schedule_work(&p->wq);
> --
> 2.7.3
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
