On Thursday, December 15, 2016 08:47:26 AM Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 12/08/2016 03:26 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, December 08, 2016 10:55:59 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:35:07 AM Jani Nikula wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 07 Dec 2016, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> On Monday, December 05, 2016 02:03:59 PM Jani Nikula wrote: > >>>>>> Different subsystems and drivers have different preferences for where > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> file bugs and what information to include. 686564434e88 ("MAINTAINERS: > >>>>>> Add bug tracking system location entry type") added "B:" entry for > >>>>>> this. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Clarify that "B:" specifies the URI for the bug tracker directly, a web > >>>>>> page for detailed info on filing bugs, or a mailto: URI. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Fixes: 686564434e88 ("MAINTAINERS: Add bug tracking system location > >>>>>> entry type") > >>>>>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rafael, I just noticed the "B:" entry popped up in MAINTAINERS from > >>>>>> 686564434e88 ("MAINTAINERS: Add bug tracking system location entry > >>>>>> type"). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've been pushing this for some time now, and I'd sent the last patch > >>>>>> adding this before the kernel summit discussion you refer to [1], and > >>>>>> Andrew picked it up, along with the rest in the series. This is where > >>>>>> the whole idea came from! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Specifying "B:" as URI lets subsystems decide whether it contains a bug > >>>>>> tracker or something else. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > Hello, > > I've noticed that [1] meanwhile landed as 2de2bd95f4563, so now we have > two different B: explanations in MAINTAINERS. Too bad this thread was > not resolved. Trying to CC some people from the kernel summit session > where bugzilla was discussed, keeping the rest of e-mail.
Oh well, feel free to send a patch to remove one description then and it can be any of them as far as I'm concerned. They are close enough to each other IMO. Thanks, Rafael
