On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:14 AM, Dongpo Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Rob and David,
>
> On 2016/12/12 22:21, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Dongpo Li <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> On 2016/12/10 6:35, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:27:58PM +0800, Dongpo Li wrote:
[...]
>>>>> @@ -20,7 +25,7 @@ Required properties:
>>>>>
>>>>> Example:
>>>>> gmac0: ethernet@f9840000 {
>>>>> - compatible = "hisilicon,hix5hd2-gmac";
>>>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hix5hd2-gemac",
>>>>> "hisilicon,hisi-gemac-v1";
>>>>
>>>> You can't just change compatible strings.
>>>>
>>> Okay, maybe I should name all the compatible string with the suffix "-gmac"
>>> instead of
>>> "-gemac". This can keep the compatible strings with the same suffix. Is
>>> this okay?
>>> Can I just add the generic compatible string without changing the SoCs
>>> compatible string?
>>> Like following:
>>> gmac0: ethernet@f9840000 {
>>> - compatible = "hisilicon,hix5hd2-gmac";
>>> + compatible = "hisilicon,hix5hd2-gmac",
>>> "hisilicon,hisi-gmac-v1";
>>
>> Yes, this is fine.
>
> As the patch series have been applied to net-next branch,
> in which way should I commit this compatible fix?
> Should I send a new patch fixing this compatible string error with "Fixes:
> xxx"?
> Looking forward to your reply!
Yes to both.
Rob
