On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 02:04:34PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > On 12/20/2016 12:45 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >Paul Turner, on Mon 19 Dec 2016 15:32:15 -0800, wrote: > >>On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Samuel Thibault > >><samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > >>>Paul Turner, on Mon 19 Dec 2016 15:26:19 -0800, wrote: > > [...] > > >>The MIN_SHARES you are seeing here is overloaded. > >>In the unscaled case this needs to be MIN_SHARES, and in the scaled > >>case, the subdivision of the scaled values must still be >=2. > > > >Ok, now I understand. I have to say this overloading is confusing. > > > >Samuel > > this had been already discussed back in August when I posted the original > patch.
Maybe we should put a comment in to avoid getting more of these ;-)
