In the unit tests check that the functions
of_overlay_destroy_last() and of_overlay_count()
work as expected.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---

v2:
        Added this patch

 drivers/of/unittest.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 53c83d6..e3fbf0b 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -1466,6 +1466,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
        struct device_node *np;
        int ret, i, ov_id[2];
        int overlay_nr = 8, unittest_nr = 8;
+       int count_before = of_overlay_count();
 
        /* we don't care about device state in this test */
 
@@ -1485,6 +1486,12 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
                                        overlay_path(overlay_nr + i));
                        return;
                }
+
+               if (count_before + i + 1 != of_overlay_count()) {
+                       unittest(0, "count does not increment by 1\n");
+                       return;
+               }
+
                ov_id[i] = ret;
                of_unittest_track_overlay(ov_id[i]);
        }
@@ -1501,7 +1508,7 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
 
        /* removing them in order should work */
        for (i = 1; i >= 0; i--) {
-               ret = of_overlay_destroy(ov_id[i]);
+               ret = of_overlay_destroy_last();
                if (ret != 0) {
                        unittest(0, "overlay @\"%s\" not destroyed @\"%s\"\n",
                                        overlay_path(overlay_nr + i),
@@ -1509,6 +1516,12 @@ static void of_unittest_overlay_8(void)
                                                PDEV_OVERLAY));
                        return;
                }
+
+               if (count_before + i != of_overlay_count()) {
+                       unittest(0, "count does not decrement by 1\n");
+                       return;
+               }
+
                of_unittest_untrack_overlay(ov_id[i]);
        }
 
-- 
2.10.2

Reply via email to