On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 12/21/16 5:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> The name pmc_plt_clk_<n> follows the data sheet specification, where >>> this convention is suggested: >>> PLT_CLK[2:0] - Camera >>> PLT_CLK[3] - Audio Codec >>> PLT_CLK[4] - >>> PLT_CLK[5] - COMMs By the way, would I suggest to use same prefix as provider, i.e. pmc_atom_plt_clk_%d ? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
