On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:19:10PM +0800, zhongjiang wrote:
> From: zhong jiang <[email protected]>
>
> I think that CONT_PTE_SHIFT is more reasonable even if they are some
> value. and the patch is not any functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> index 2e49bd2..0a4c97b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static __init int setup_hugepagesz(char *opt)
> static __init int add_default_hugepagesz(void)
> {
> if (size_to_hstate(CONT_PTES * PAGE_SIZE) == NULL)
> - hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PMD_SHIFT);
> + hugetlb_add_hstate(CONT_PTE_SHIFT);
> return 0;
> }
> arch_initcall(add_default_hugepagesz);
It looks like I fixed this already when I merged some other hugetlb
patches. See commit 6ed0038d5ecb ("arm64: Fix typo in
add_default_hugepagesz() for 64K pages").
--
Catalin
