thanks, I will update it.

在 2017/1/6 18:10, Jan Kara 写道:
On Fri 06-01-17 16:12:55, Gu Zheng wrote:
This change was missed the tmpfs modification in In CVE-2016-7097
commit 073931017b49d9458aa351605b43a7e34598caef
posix_acl: Clear SGID bit when setting file permissions.
It can test by xfstest generic/375, which failed to clear
setgid bit in the following test case on tmpfs:

   touch $testfile
   chown 100:100 $testfile
   chmod 2755 $testfile
   _runas -u 100 -g 101 -- setfacl -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::rwx $testfile

Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guzhe...@huawei.com>

Ah, good catch. One comment below:

diff --git a/fs/posix_acl.c b/fs/posix_acl.c
index 5955220..d014dff 100644
--- a/fs/posix_acl.c
+++ b/fs/posix_acl.c
@@ -922,11 +922,10 @@ int simple_set_acl(struct inode *inode, struct posix_acl 
*acl, int type)
        int error;

        if (type == ACL_TYPE_ACCESS) {
-               error = posix_acl_equiv_mode(acl, &inode->i_mode);
-               if (error < 0)
-                       return 0;
-               if (error == 0)
-                       acl = NULL;
+               error = posix_acl_update_mode(inode,
+                               &inode->i_mode, &acl);
+               if (error > 0)
+                       return error;

Uh, why this error > 0 check? AFAIU it should be:

        if (error < 0)
                return 0;

As it used to be before...

                                                                Honza


Reply via email to