On 10/1/17 7:58 pm, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2017 16:25:29 Chris Lapa wrote:
From: Chris Lapa <ch...@lapa.com.au>
The BQ275XX definition exists only to satisfy backwards compatibility.
tested: yes
Instead "tested: yes" we use: "Tested-by: name <email>" line.
Signed-off-by: Chris Lapa <ch...@lapa.com.au>
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew F. Davis <a...@ti.com>
Doh, I went through the log and thought I saw 'tested: yes' being used
previously. Want me to resend?
Thanks,
Chris Lapa
