On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not 2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't exist when Con published his patch. (Con published it ~12 hours before the release of 2.6.20.2, from what I can tell.) How can he base his work on something that didn't yet exist? (And it applied cleanly to 2.6.20.1, the latest when he published it.) That said, being able to easily apply it to the latest stable kernel would probably increase adoption, yes. I will agree with that much. -- ~Mike - Just the crazy copy cat. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
