On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
> On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
> >2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
^^^^^^^^^^
> Maybe I'm naive, but I find this hard to understand -- 2.6.20.2 didn't
> exist when Con published his patch. (Con published it ~12 hours before
> the release of 2.6.20.2, from what I can tell.) How can he base his
> work on something that didn't yet exist? (And it applied cleanly to
> 2.6.20.1, the latest when he published it.)
You see the words I have underlined ? "next time". I know for sure he
published it before 2.6.20.2, but now that it is out, I suggested that
Con rebases his work on this version for new releases.
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
