Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] > Heading in the right direction, but this is equivalent to: > > if (isalnum(*p) && *p != '-' && *p != '_') return -EINVAL; > > which is faster, smaller and easier to read. And wrong. ;-) -- Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Chris Evans
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Keith Owens
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Nick Holloway
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit David Woodhouse
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Horst von Brand
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Peter Samuelson
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Daniel Phillips
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Daniel Phillips
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit David Relson
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Horst von Brand
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Alan Cox
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Keith Owens
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Torsten Duwe
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Alan Cox