On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 03:08:42PM +0530, Nayna wrote: > > > From: "Ken Goldman" <kg...@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > <mailto:kg...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> > > Date: 26-Jan-2017 2:53 AM > > Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v9 2/2] tpm: add securityfs > > support,for TPM 2.0 firmware event log > > To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > <mailto:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>>, > > <linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org > > <mailto:linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org>>, > > <tpmdd-de...@lists.sourceforge.net > > <mailto:tpmdd-de...@lists.sourceforge.net>> > > Cc: > > > > You do not need to send a new patch set version as long as this > > one gets peer tested. And it needs to be tested without hacks > > like plumbing TCPA with TPM 2.0 in QEMU. OF code paths needs to > > be peer tested to be more specific. > > > > For me the code itself looks good but I simply cannot take it in > > in the current situation. > > > > /Jarkko > > > > > > Tested-by: Kenneth Goldman <kg...@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > <mailto:kg...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> > > > > I validated a firmware event log taken from a Power 8 against PCR 0-7 > > values for the SHA-1 and SHA-256 banks from a Nuvoton TPM 2.0 chip on > > that same platform. > > > > Thank You Ken. > > Jarkko, I hope now these patches can be accepted for 4.11. > > Thanks & Regards, > - Nayna
Thanks Ken. I somehow managed to miss that response. /Jarkko
