Hi Bjorn,

On 02/06/2017 01:08 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Tue 24 Jan 15:13 PST 2017, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote:

The rproc_add_virtio_devices() requests firmware asynchronously and
triggers boot if the auto_boot flag is set. However, this
asynchronous call seems to be redundant for non auto-boot scenario
since the rproc_boot() would call request_firmware() anyways. Move
the auto_boot check to rproc_add() so that a redundant call to
_request_firmware can be avoided for non auto-boot case.

Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjo...@codeaurora.org>

Looks good, applied both patches.

Thanks for the review and applying these(and couple others) patches.

Regards,
Sarang

Regards,
Bjorn

---

I'm requesting RFC on this patch since I'm not aware of any scenario
where we might need asynchronous firmware loading for non auto-boot case.

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c 
b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index f58e634..16242b0 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -970,9 +970,7 @@ static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware 
*fw, void *context)
 {
        struct rproc *rproc = context;

-       /* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
-       if (rproc->auto_boot)
-               rproc_boot(rproc);
+       rproc_boot(rproc);

        release_firmware(fw);
 }
@@ -1286,9 +1284,13 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)

        /* create debugfs entries */
        rproc_create_debug_dir(rproc);
-       ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc);
-       if (ret < 0)
-               return ret;
+
+       /* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
+       if (rproc->auto_boot) {
+               ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc);
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       return ret;
+       }

        /* expose to rproc_get_by_phandle users */
        mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to