On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:29:51 -0500 Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:24:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:07:03 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > There's way too much code here to expect it to get decently reviewed, > > > alas. > > > > Yes. > > > > /me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml. :( > > Just curious, but where would you suggest this be sent to for review then?
Valid question. I should have chosen some other more appropriate patch to make that comment. I don't see a better list for UBI patches, so lkml is OK IMO. Here is a summary of my thinking on Linux-related mailing lists. 1. Bug reports can go to lkml or focused mailing lists. 2. Development (like patches) should go to focused mailing lists if there is such a list and they have enough usage. Development areas that qualify for this IMO are: - ACPI - ATA - file systems - frame buffer - ieee1394 - MM/VM - multimedia - networking - PCI - power management, suspend/resume - SCSI - sound - USB - virtualization (not that I expect anything close to concensus on this) --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
