On 02/15/2017 03:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:50:27PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 01:01:59PM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote:
>>> Due to known (although trivial) conflicts in silicon-errata.txt, based on >>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/core >> It might be best to split the silicon-errata doc into a separate patch. >> That can go via the arm64 tree without conflict whiel the driver patch >> can go via the tty tree. > > Well, I can't take this as-is because I get conflicts in my tty tree > with the doc, and with the driver itself: > > checking file Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt > Hunk #1 FAILED at 68. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED > checking file drivers/acpi/spcr.c > checking file drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c > Hunk #5 FAILED at 2370. > 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED > > I have no idea what the driver conflict is, what branch was this made > against? I'll make the split Mark suggested in v4, basing driver changes on gregkh/tty tty-next unless someone suggests otherwise. (FWIW the previous base was arm64/linux.git for-next/core.) Thanks, Cov -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.