On Friday, February 17, 2017 12:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> To enable eventual removal of pr_warning.
>
> This makes pr_warn use consistent for arch/arm
>
> Prior to this patch, there were 2 uses of pr_warning and
> 405 uses of pr_warn in arch/arm
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
> index c393b1b0310d..d6e907b6cc31 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
> @@ -346,9 +346,9 @@ void __init ep93xx_register_i2c(struct
> i2c_gpio_platform_data *data,
> * CMOS driver.
> */
> if (data->sda_is_open_drain && data->sda_pin != EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_EEDAT)
> - pr_warning("sda != EEDAT, open drain has no effect\n");
> + pr_warn("sda != EEDAT, open drain has no effect\n");
> if (data->scl_is_open_drain && data->scl_pin != EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_EECLK)
> - pr_warning("scl != EECLK, open drain has no effect\n");
> + pr_warn("scl != EECLK, open drain has no effect\n");
>
> __raw_writel((data->sda_is_open_drain << 1) |
> (data->scl_is_open_drain << 0),
For the ep93xx part:
Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hswee...@visionengravers.com>
