On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 03:08:47PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:19:03AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>...
> >>My initial question is that I don't want anyone using CONFIG_QE_83xx
> >>or CONFIG_QE_85xx in code, the second part is if there is a way to
> >>remove duplicating the QE_83xx/QE_85xx options down in platform/8
> >>{3,5}
> >>xx/Kconfig.
> >
> >
> >What about the following solution:
> >
> >
> >arch/powerpc/Kconfig.qe:
> >
> ><-- snip -->
> >
> >config MACH_SUPPORTS_QE
> > bool
> >
> >config QE
> > bool "QUICC Engine Support"
> > depends on MACH_SUPPORTS_QE
> > help
> > ...
> >
> ><-- snip -->
> >
> >
> >arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig:
> >
> ><-- snip -->
> >
> >...
> >source arch/powerpc/Kconfig.qe
> >
> >config PPC_MPC836x
> > bool
> > select MACH_SUPPORTS_QE
> > ...
> >....
> >
> ><-- snip -->
>
> Not sure this helps since I end up having to source arch/powerpc/
> Kconfig.qe from both arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfig & arch/
> powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig and then mconf grips about having
> already scanned Kconfig.qe.
Sorry, my fault that I didn't test it myself before suggesting it.
It seems there is no solution for both not duplicating the options and
getting them in the desired menu.
> - k
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
