Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
> > > I have updated the dmfe.c network driver for 2.4.0-test by adding proper
> > > locking (I hope), and also made transmission much efficient.
> > Would you mind creating a separate patch that -just- correcting the SMP
> > safety? That makes it much easier to review and apply, and then we can
> > consider the other changes...
> Such a patch will appear shortly. I and Frank Davis are currently merging
> our patches for dmfe.c.
Thanks a bunch.
> [Actually, I just added reasonable locks while my main goal was to improve
> performance. I did not realize that there was such a strong need for SMP
> safety (since it has been broken in that regard for a long time, without
> anyone fixing it).]
The kernel driver APIs are designed so that SMP and UP cases are equally
high-performance, and portable beyond the x86 platform.
Pretty much all ISA and PCI drivers need to be portable and SMP safe...
if not so, it's a bug. That said, there is certainly more motivation to
make a popular PCI driver is SMP safe than an older ISA driver. And
portability is [IMHO] less of a priority than SMP safety, though it
depends on the hardware being supported.
Regards,
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
