Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Frank Davis wrote:
> >
> > I would rather fix those non-SMP compliant drivers to be SMP compliant,
> > then keeping them 'broken'. Adding the print statements would only be a
> > temporary solution.
>
> Of course. This list of priorites is very natural, I think:
>
> 1. Working SMP driver
> 2. Broken SMP driver with a warning.
> 3. Broken SMP driver without a warning. (Even if "everyone" knows it
> is broken)
>
> It takes less than a minute to add such a warning, but it can take days
> or weeks to find someone to really fix the driver. That was my point.
Marking them with a #warning is fine with me.
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
