On 03/07/2017 12:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:03:48AM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> It was found that the current rwsem_is_contended() function did not
>> look at the status of the OSQ and hence would miss waiters on OSQ. So
>> that function is now modified to look at the OSQ as well.
> Ideally I'd kill the entire function.
>
>       if (need_resched() ||
>           rwsem_is_contended(&fs_info->commit_root_sem)) {
>               if (wakeup)
>                       caching_ctl->progress = last;
>               btrfs_release_path(path);
>               up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
>               mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
>               cond_resched();
>               mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
>               down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
>               goto next;
>       }
>
> is the only user of it in the entire tree and it makes no bloody sense
> what so ever. rwsem is a preemptible lock after all.

That works for me too. I do realize that there is only one user in the
kernel, but I am hesitant to change it as I am not familiar with that
piece of code.

Cheers,
Longman

Reply via email to