On 3/22/07, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:14:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 3/21/07, Bob Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +config I2C_BLACKFIN_TWI > > > + tristate "Blackfin TWI I2C support" > > > + depends on I2C && (BF534 || BF536 || BF537) > > > + help > > > + This is the TWI I2C device driver for Blackfin 534/536/537. > > > + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module > > > + will be called i2c-bfin-twi. > > > > Pardon my ignorance, but is there any reason to call it "Blackfin TWI" > > as opposed to just "Blackfin" since TWI and I2C mean the same thing? > > It lends itself to some redundancies such as: > > > > > + pr_info("I2C: Blackfin I2C TWI driver\n"); > > it reflects the hardware manual and all public Analog Devices > documentation ... the peripheral is always referred to as a "Two Wire > Interface that is fully compatible with the I2C standard" since using > the "I2C" term is not freeDamn, I hate it when legal idiocy takes the lead on technical clarity :(
i'm with you 100% but it isnt my call to make ;( -mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
